Teach one course of record
Fellows lead a single course under a supervised instructional appointment, receiving formative feedback on course planning, instruction, assessment, and student engagement.
Five parallel strands of activity run across the nine-month appointment, from August 2026 through April 2027.
At a glance
Scroll horizontally to see the full timeline →
CTE Interface Conference milestone / deliverable Summative evaluation
Semester one
The fall semester establishes teaching practice, pedagogical grounding, and the observational basis for each fellow’s instructional innovation.
Fellows lead a single course under a supervised instructional appointment, receiving formative feedback on course planning, instruction, assessment, and student engagement.
Mentor meetings begin in preparation for the semester and continue biweekly — covering teaching challenges, classroom observations, professional growth, and career development.
Fellows complete either the Great Teaching for New Faculty Certificate through Passport to Great Teaching, or the Pathways to Excellence program.
Structured classroom observations across two class sessions, followed by guided reflection on evidence-based instructional practices.
Drawing on observations, professional development, and mentor discussion, each fellow proposes a new pedagogy, educational technology, assessment strategy, or course redesign to carry into the spring.
Mentors document observations of planning, instruction, assessment, and engagement throughout the semester.
Semester two
The spring semester doubles the teaching load and turns the fall proposal into an evaluated, publicly presented contribution.
Fellows take on a two-course load, continuing to receive formative mentor feedback across both.
Mentoring shifts to a monthly cadence, with continued feedback on the instructional innovation and scholarly teaching project.
The proposed innovation is deployed in one of the two spring courses and systematically evaluated.
Fellows deliver a scholarly teaching contribution, meeting the appointment’s expectation of demonstrating scholarly teaching through systematic evaluation and dissemination.
A summative evaluation conducted jointly by the faculty mentor(s) and the Department or Unit Chair assesses overall growth and readiness as an engineering educator.
Fellows conclude the nine-month appointment having satisfied all three summative requirements.
Key milestones
Fellows are paired with mentors; biweekly meetings start in preparation for the semester.
Complete the selected CTE teaching development program and attend two observation sessions in exemplary engineering courses.
Each fellow proposes the instructional innovation to be implemented in a Spring 2027 course.
The innovation is deployed and systematically evaluated within a course of record.
The culminating scholarly teaching contribution is presented publicly.
Faculty mentor(s) and the Department or Unit Chair jointly assess the fellow’s growth and readiness.